MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2891144899 · doi:10.1109/lawp.2018.2869321

Solar Panel Integrated Circular Polarized Aperture-Coupled Patch Antenna for CubeSat Applications

2018· article· en· W2891144899 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.
fundA Canadian funder is recorded on the work.

Bibliographic record

VenueIEEE Antennas and Wireless Propagation Letters · 2018
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicAntenna Design and Analysis
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Alberta
FundersAlberta Innovates - Technology FuturesCMC Microsystems
KeywordsCubeSatMicrostrip antennaPatch antennaAntenna measurementAntenna (radio)Electronic engineeringOptoelectronicsOpticsElectrical engineeringEngineeringPhysicsAerospace engineeringSatellite

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In this letter, we propose to integrate a microstrip antenna with commercial solar cells for CubeSat applications where there is a small surface area available for a combination of antennas and solar cells. By placing the radiator for an aperture-coupled patch antenna under the solar cells, it is shown that a directional antenna system can be incorporated into a CubeSat without significant impact to the performance of the antenna. Considering stringent size restrictions involved in CubeSat designs, the proposed solution provides significant overall system size reduction and design flexibility. The solar cell integrated antenna is designed for operation in the 2.2-2.3 GHz space-to-Earth downlink band. Circular polarization is achieved by feeding two 90° rotated patches with a 90° phase offset signal. The results show very promising performance.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.994
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.015
GPT teacher head0.215
Teacher spread0.200 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it