MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2891161225 · doi:10.3917/ripc.243.0257

L’incomplète construction des politiques municipales de lutte contre les discriminations raciales. Enquête dans les villes de Lyon, Nantes et Strasbourg (2001-2012)

2018· article· fr· W2891161225 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueRevue internationale de politique comparée · 2018
Typearticle
Languagefr
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicMulticulturalism, Politics, Migration, Gender
Canadian institutionsSNC-Lavalin (Canada)
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHumanitiesPolitical scienceArt

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Cet article interroge le changement de politique à l’égard des minorités ethniques dans trois municipalités françaises. Il met en lumière la lente conversion politique et institutionnelle des administrations d’une politique d’intégration vers une politique de lutte contre les discriminations raciales. Ce changement graduel et limité s’explique par la faiblesse des ressources politiques et administratives dont disposent les élus et les agents municipaux. En outre, l’alternance partisane au sein de l’exécutif municipal, ainsi que les relations avec des associations du fait migratoire constituent autant de facteurs favorisant dans les années 2000 l’avènement d’une politique de lutte contre les discriminations raciales. Finalement, la question raciale fait l’objet de résistances pour s’imposer, et est éclipsée lorsque l’articulation entre intégration et discrimination ne se produit plus. Cet article plaide ainsi pour des études de cas approfondis et comparés pour saisir les facteurs du changement dans l’action publique et pour analyser les politiques de non-discrimination en France.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesScience and technology studies
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.670
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.007
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.163
GPT teacher head0.417
Teacher spread0.254 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it