MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2891219926 · doi:10.1002/2016gc006747

Near‐vent chemical processes in a hydrothermal plume: Insights from an integrated study of the <scp>E</scp>ndeavour segment

2017· article· en· W2891219926 on OpenAlexafffundabout
L. A. Coogan, Armaghan Attar, S. F. Mihaly, M. A. Jeffries, Matthew E. Pope

Bibliographic record

VenueGeochemistry Geophysics Geosystems · 2017
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEarth and Planetary Sciences
TopicGeology and Paleoclimatology Research
Canadian institutionsOcean Networks Canada SocietyUniversity of Victoria
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaOffice of the National Coordinator for Health Information Technology
KeywordsPlumeHydrothermal circulationHydrothermal ventGeologyRidgeWater columnPanacheMineralogySeafloor spreadingGeochemistryGeophysicsOceanographyPaleontologyMeteorology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract The Endeavour segment of the Juan de Fuca mid‐ocean ridge is one of the best studied ridge segments and has recently been instrumented as part of Ocean Networks Canada's NEPTUNE cabled observatory. Here we investigate the interaction between high‐temperature vent fluids and the overlying water column. A new tow‐yo survey found that the average temperature anomaly in the neutrally buoyant plume was ∼0.043°C. The water column temperature and light attenuation anomalies correlate linearly in some areas of the plume but in other areas there is a low light attenuation anomaly relative to the temperature anomaly. This temperature excess is interpreted to reflect heat input through (particle‐poor) diffuse flow. If this is correct, about half of the heat flux along the Endeavour segment comes from diffuse flow. Sediment trap and push core data show that the mass accumulation rate of the hydrothermal component of the sediments decreases rapidly with distance from the major vent fields. Large changes in the composition of the hydrothermal component of the sediments also occur with distance from the vent fields. The composition of the sediments indicates (i) sulfides precipitate early and accumulate most rapidly close to the vents with a preferential order of element removal from the plume of Cd &gt; Ag &gt; Cu &gt; Co ∼ Fe; (ii) barite is deposited somewhat further from the vents. Strontium and Pb appear to be strongly incorporated in barite and/or other sulfate minerals; (iii) at most a few percent of the mass of these “insoluble” elements that is vented gets deposited within 1.5 km of the vents.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.033
Threshold uncertainty score0.994

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.014
GPT teacher head0.239
Teacher spread0.225 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations22
Published2017
Admission routes3
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueGeochemistry Geophysics GeosystemsSame topicGeology and Paleoclimatology ResearchFrench-language works237,207