MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2891221095

Digital agency to empower equity in education : Summary Report

2017· article· en· W2891221095 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

fundA Canadian funder is recorded on the work.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueLancaster EPrints (Lancaster University) · 2017
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicEducational Leadership and Innovation
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersUniversitetet i OsloUniversity of MumbaiVictoria University of WellingtonTel Aviv UniversityVictoria UniversityCurtin University of TechnologyTata TrustsGriffith UniversityUniversity of North TexasUniversity of WollongongAl Akhawayn University in IfraneItä-Suomen YliopistoUniversité de SherbrookeVrije Universiteit BrusselKing's College LondonDublin City UniversityUniversiteit van AmsterdamMonash UniversityUniversité LavalWest Virginia UniversityUniversity of CanterburyTata Institute of Social SciencesManchester Metropolitan UniversityUniversity of OtagoArizona State UniversityNova Southeastern UniversityKasetsart University
KeywordsAgency (philosophy)Equity (law)Public relationsEmpowermentPolitical scienceEconomic growthBusinessSociologyEconomicsSocial science
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In EDUsummIT 2017, Thematic Working Group (TWG) 4 researched digital agency empowering equity in education. In a world where digital engagement with learning is increasing, both onsite and online, it is important that concepts and concerns of digital agency are considered appropriately by policymakers and practitioners when they develop and implement provision for learners, locally, regionally, nationally and internationally.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.421
Threshold uncertainty score0.782

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.075
GPT teacher head0.376
Teacher spread0.301 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it