MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2891223262 · doi:10.14447/jnmes.v19i3.239

Corrosion Inhibition of a Gas Sparged Copper Cylinder in a Solution of NaCl and Na2S by Using 4-Amino-4H-1,2,4-triazole as Corrosion Inhibitor

2016· article· en· W2891223262 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Saad Al-Shahrani

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of New Materials for Electrochemical Systems · 2016
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMaterials Science
TopicCorrosion Behavior and Inhibition
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsCorrosionCopperCorrosion inhibitorMetallurgyChemistryMaterials scienceNuclear chemistry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Most of previous investigations for corrosion inhibition of copper using triazole derivatives were carried out in stagnant conditions and mainly in presence either NaCl or Na2S. The main aim of this work is to investigate the performance of one of triazole derivatives namely, 4-Amino-4H-1,2,4-triazole (AHT) on improving the corrosion resistance of gas sparged copper parts in a solution comprised of NaCl and Na2S with different propotions. The potentiodynamic technique was used for investigating the effect of different variables on the corrosion rate of gas sparged copper such as gas velocity, initial S-2 concentration, gas sparged copper cylinder diameter, and initial AHT inhibitor concentration. The results show that the %improvement in corrosion resistance depends mainly on two main parameters, gas flow rate and amount of AHT inhibitor added. For lower gas velocities 0.07 cm/s the %improvement ranges from 6 to 22%, while for higher gas rate 0.35 cm/s it ranges from 2 to 7% depending on the amount of inhibitor added. The activation energy of the reaction was found to increase by approximately 20% by addition of the inhibitor up to 10ppm.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.007

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.021
GPT teacher head0.270
Teacher spread0.249 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2016
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of New Materials for Electrochemical SystemsSame topicCorrosion Behavior and InhibitionFrench-language works237,207