Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The aim of this article is to examine the conceptualization of Nature in Alain of Lille’s De Planctu Naturae , determining how the author construes the justification of the thesis that homosexual desire is contrary to nature and the implications that can be drawn from it concerning gender and sexuality in general. Given that Alain of Lille utilizes (at least) three metaphors to account for copulation, in order to represent it as paradigmatically heterosexual, this paper studies them in three respective sections (3-5). Furthermore, this research integrates an anonymous and contemporary text that addresses the aforementioned topics: Altercatio Ganimedis et Helene. Sources Alanus ab Insulis, 1844-92, De Planctu Naturae , en Migne, Jacques Paul (ed.), Patrologia latina , Vol. 210, Paris, Garnier. Alain of Lille & Haring, Nikolaus (ed.), 1978, De Planctu Naturae . Studi Medievali 19, 2, pp. 797–879. Alain of Lille & Sheridan, James (ed.), 1980, De planctu naturae , Toronto, Pontifical Institute of Mediaeval Studies. Lenzen, Rolf, 1972, “ Altercatio Ganimedis et Helene : Kritische Edition mit Kommentar”, Mittellateinisches Jahrbuch 7, pp. 161-186. Bibliography Abbot, Elizabeth, 2001, A History of Celibacy , United Kingdom, Redwood Books. Aquino, Santo Tomas de, Summa Theologiae , disponible en el portal Corpus Thomisticum , www.corpusthomisticum.org. Arias, Ricardo (comp.), 1970, La poesia de los goliardos , Madrid, Gredos. Boswell, John, 1980, Christianity, Social Tolerance, and Homosexuality , Chicago, University of Chicago Press. Burgwinkle, William, 2004, Sodomy, Masculinity, and Law in Medieval Literature : France and England, 1050–1230 , Cambridge, UK, Cambridge University Press. Crompton, Louis, 2004, Homosexuality and civilization , Cambridge, London, Massachusetts, Harvard University Press. Erickson, Carolly, 1976, The Medieval Vision: Essays in History and Perception , New York, Oxford University Press. Foucault, Michel, 2008, Historia de la Sexualidad: La Voluntad de Saber, Buenos Aires, Siglo XXI. Galonnier, Alain; Solere, Jean Luc; Vasiliu, Anca (eds.), 2005, Alain de Lille, Le Docteur Universel, Philosophie, theologie et litterature au XII e siecle , Turnhout, Brepols. Gauthier, Albert, 1977, “La Sodomie dans le droit canonique medieval”, en Roy, Bruno (ed.), L'Erotisme au moyen âge, Montreal, Aurore. Green, Richard, 1956, “Alan of Lille's De Planctu Naturae ”, Speculum , Vol. 31, No. 4, pp. 649-674. Greenberg, David & Bystryn, Marcia, 1982, “Christian Intolerance of Homosexuality”, American Journal of Sociology , Vol. 88, No. 3, pp. 515-548. Godman, Peter, 2000, The silent masters. Latin literature and its censors in the High Middle Ages , Princeton (N.J.), Princeton University Press. Jordan, Mark, 1997, The Invention of Sodomy in Christian Theology, Chicago, University of Chicago Press. Kuefler, Mathew, 2003, “Male friendship and the suspicion of sodomy in twelfth-century France”, en Farmer, Sharon & Pasternack, Carol (eds.), Gender and Difference in the Middle Ages , Minneapolis, Minnesota University Press. Lange, Linda, 2003, “Woman is not a rational animal: On Aristotle’s biology of reproduction”, en Harding, Sandra & Hintikka, Merrill (eds.), Discovering Reality: Feminist Perspectives on Epistemology, Metaphysics, Methodology, and Philosophy of Science , Netherlands, Kluwer Academic Publishers. Leupin, Alexandre, 1989, Barbarolexis: Medieval Writing and Sexuality, traduccion K. Cooper , Cambridge, MA, Harvard University Press. Mills, Robert, 2005, Suspended animation: pain, pleasure and punishment in medieval culture, London, Reaktion Books. Mills, Robert, 2015, Seeing Sodomy in the Middle Ages , Chicago, University of Chicago Press. Newman, Barbara, 2003, “Natura(II): Goddess of the Normative”, en God and the Goddesses: Vision, Poetry, and Belief in the Middle Ages , Philadelphia, University of Pennsylvania Press. Pittenger, Elizabeth, 2013, “Explicit Ink”, en Fradenburg, Louise & Freccero, Carla (eds.), Premodern sexualities, London, Routledge. Rollo, David, 2011, Kiss My Relics: Hermaphroditic Fictions of the Middle Ages , Chicago, University of Chicago Press. Rubio, Francisco, 1999, “Dos aportaciones relacionadas con la metafora gramatical en el De planctu naturae de Alain de Lille”, Faventia , 21/2, pp. 105-116 . Scanlon, Larry, 1995, “Unspeakable Pleasures: Alain de Lille, Sexual Regulation and the Priesthood of Genius”, Romanic Review 86, 2, pp. 213–242. Schibanoff, Susan, 2001, “Sodomy’s mark. Alan of Lille, Jean de Meun and the medieval theory of authorship”, en Burger, Glen & Kruger, Steven (eds.), Queering the Middle Ages, Minneapolis, University of Minnesota Press. Sylvester, Louise, 2008, Medieval romance and the construction of heterosexuality , New York, Palgrave Macmillan. Westphal, Carl, 1870, Die contrare Sexualempfindung (El sentimiento sexual contrario), Archiv fur Psychiatrie , Berlin. Wetherbee, Winthrop, 2011, “Alan of Lille, De planctu Naturae . The fall of nature and the survival of poetry”, The Journal of Medieval Latin 21, pp. 223-251. Ziolkowski, Jan, 1985, Alan of Lille's Grammar of Sex: The Meaning of Grammar to a Twelfth-Century Intellectual, Cambridge, Medieval Academy.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it