MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2891392030 · doi:10.1080/24725854.2018.1519744

Integrated design of emergency shelter and medical networks considering diurnal population shifts in urban areas

2018· article· en· W2891392030 on OpenAlexaff
Qingmi Hu, Laijun Zhao, Huiyong Li, Rongbing Huang

Bibliographic record

VenueIISE Transactions · 2018
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBusiness, Management and Accounting
TopicFacility Location and Emergency Management
Canadian institutionsYork University
FundersNational Natural Science Foundation of China
KeywordsSolverPopulationBenders' decompositionDecompositionScale (ratio)Integer programmingComputer scienceNetwork planning and designOperations researchMathematical optimizationSimulationGeographyEngineeringMathematicsAlgorithmTelecommunicationsMedicineEnvironmental healthCartography

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This article addresses an emergency shelter and medical network design problem by integrating evacuation and medical service activities and considering diurnal population shifts to respond to large-scale natural disasters in urban areas. A multi-objective mixed-integer programming model that incorporates the characteristics of diurnal population shifts is developed to determine the configuration of the integrated emergency shelter and medical network. An accelerated Benders decomposition algorithm is then devised to solve large-scale problems in reasonable time. A realistic case study on the Xuhui District of Shanghai City in China and extensive numerical experiments are presented to demonstrate the effectiveness of the proposed model and solution method. Computational results suggest that more emergency shelters and emergency medical centers should be established when accounting for diurnal population shifts than when diurnal population shifts are not considered. The accelerated Benders decomposition algorithm is significantly more time efficient as compared with the CPLEX solver.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.005
Threshold uncertainty score0.010

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.036
GPT teacher head0.253
Teacher spread0.217 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations17
Published2018
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueIISE TransactionsSame topicFacility Location and Emergency ManagementFrench-language works237,207