MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2891529738 · doi:10.3138/jmvfh.2017-0020

Injured female Veterans’ experiences with community reintegration: a qualitative study

2018· article· en· W2891529738 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Brent L. Hawkins, Brandi M. Crowe

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Military Veteran and Family Health · 2018
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPsychology
TopicPosttraumatic Stress Disorder Research
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsQualitative researchVeterans AffairsPsychologyInterpretative phenomenological analysisMeaning (existential)PerceptionSoftware deploymentMilitary personnelSocial psychologyClinical psychologyApplied psychologyMedicinePsychotherapistSociologyPolitical science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Introduction: Reintegration back into civilian life post-deployment can be difficult for military Veterans, particularly those who have physical and psychological injuries. Research indicates that male and female Veterans may experience reintegration differently as a result of their deployment experiences and gender-specific social role expectations. Limited research specific to female Veterans’ reintegration experiences exists in the empirical literature. Therefore, the purpose of this qualitative study was to better understand community reintegration experiences among injured female Veterans. Methods: Phenomenology guided the data collection and analysis. NVivo was used to aid in organization and analysis of the data. An iterative clustering process was used to identify meaning units, resulting in categories and themes that best represented the participants’ experiences. Bracketing procedures were used to account for researcher bias. Results: Three categories and multiple themes emerged from the qualitative analysis: category 1, community reintegration meaning; category 2, perception of community reintegration, which had three themes – (1) reintegration is harder than expected, (2) reintegration is a process, and (3) reintegration involves finding a new normal – and category 3, women’s experience post-deployment, which had four themes – (1) society’s misguided perceptions of women in the military, (2) readjusted or redefined roles and responsibilities as a woman, (3) lingering effects of military sexual trauma, and (4) lack of female-specific services. Discussion: This study suggests a need for female-specific programs within US Department of Veterans Affairs and civilian-based organizations providing services to Veterans. In addition, allied health professionals are encouraged to assess community reintegration to allow for more individualized, long-term transition plans for female Veterans reintegrating into civilian life.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.006
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.008
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Qualitative · Consensus signal: Qualitative
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.012
Threshold uncertainty score0.033

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0060.008
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0020.002
Science and technology studies0.0120.006
Scholarly communication0.0050.003
Open science0.0020.005
Research integrity0.0020.003
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0060.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.192
GPT teacher head0.493
Teacher spread0.300 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designQualitative
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations10
Published2018
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Military Veteran and Family HealthSame topicPosttraumatic Stress Disorder ResearchFrench-language works237,207