MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2891531270 · doi:10.7202/1059042ar

La (in)coherencia identitaria

2018· article· fr· W2891531270 on OpenAlexvenueaboutno aff
Léonore Brassard

Bibliographic record

VenueSens public · 2018
Typearticle
Languagefr
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicComparative Literary Analysis and Criticism
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHumanitiesArt

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Nelly Arcan et Kathy Acker, deux auteures ayant marqué leur milieu littéraire – celui québécois contemporain pour l’une, celui punk américain des années 80 pour l’autre – partagent entre autres thématiques similaires, une réflexion sur l’identité, et plus spécifiquement sur l’identité de genre, telle qu’elle est créée par le langage. Et si chacune se constate pareillement faite par le discours, leur œuvre n’en est pas moins, de l’une à l’autre, singulière. Ce texte s’interroge sur la construction d’une identité fluide, variable, toujours réinterprétée, telle qu’elle peut se lire dans les romans de Kathy Acker, en la comparant à l’identité figée dans les mots et leur cohérence écrasante des récits de Nelly Arcan. Comment penser le rapport à l’identité chez chacune, telle que mise en scène dans des personnages à la fois vidés et saturés par le langage ?

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesScholarly communication, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.930
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0330.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.042
GPT teacher head0.280
Teacher spread0.238 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2018
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueSens publicSame topicComparative Literary Analysis and CriticismFrench-language works237,207