MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2891555810 · doi:10.1093/infdis/jiy535

Cytokine Profiles and Severity of Influenza Infection in Transplant Recipients

2018· article· en· W2891555810 on OpenAlexafffund
Arnaud G. L’Huillier, Victor H. Ferreira, Cédric Hirzel, Elisa Cordero, Ajit P. Limaye, Gail Reid, Janet A. Englund, Emily A. Blumberg, Deepali Kumar, Atul Humar

Bibliographic record

VenueThe Journal of Infectious Diseases · 2018
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicInfluenza Virus Research Studies
Canadian institutionsUniversity Health Network
FundersUniversity of California, San FranciscoUniversity of Illinois at Urbana-ChampaignUniversity of TorontoUniversiteit LeidenUniversity of AlbertaNational Science FoundationUniversity of WashingtonSeattle Children's Research InstituteUniversity of PennsylvaniaSchweizerischer Nationalfonds zur Förderung der Wissenschaftlichen ForschungGilead SciencesSanofiGenentechUniversity of PittsburghPfizerCincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center
KeywordsImmunologyPneumoniaMedicineIntensive care unitImmune systemViral loadCytokineTransplantationInternal medicineVirus

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Influenza is responsible for significant morbidity after transplantation. We evaluated T-helper 1/T-helper 2 (Th2) cytokines and interleukin (IL) 10 levels during influenza infection in the posttransplant setting. Serum samples from 277 transplant recipients were analyzed at influenza diagnosis and 28 days later for interferon gamma (IFN-γ), IL-4, IL-13, and IL-10. IL-13 levels were associated with protection against pneumonia and intensive care unit (ICU) admission, whereas the IFN-γ/IL-13 ratio and IL-10 levels were associated with an increased risk of pneumonia and ICU admission. This association was independent of viral load. A skewing of immune responses toward Th2 in transplant patients appears to confer protection from severe influenza infection, independent of viral load.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.003

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.037
GPT teacher head0.348
Teacher spread0.311 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations8
Published2018
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe Journal of Infectious DiseasesSame topicInfluenza Virus Research StudiesFrench-language works237,207