Collaboration interprofessionnelle pour la santé buccodentaire des personnes âgées – esquisse de mise en œuvre
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Accelerated ageing of the population results in an ever-increasing number of functionally dependent elderly persons. Even healthy older people experience self-care deficits due to decreased mobility, endurance and sensory loss. Residents in long-term care centres depend on caregivers for the majority of their activities of daily living.Dental services for functionally dependent seniors generally remain inadequate. Several factors may explain this situation, including the absence of government guidelines and the lack of initial and continuing training of both dental and non-dental personnel.Based on a review of the scientific literature published between 1970-2016, four strategies were identified to improve this problem:Promoting, supporting and formalizing interprofessional collaboration.Building a common vision for oral health.Developing complementary and shared professional and relational skills.Redefining the roles and responsibilities of primary care practitioners.These strategies could be considered in the process of implementing a dental service adapted to the needs of this population group.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.009 | 0.007 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.008 | 0.002 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".