PW 1994 Hair-3R’s (recognise, respond and refer) – family violence on how community memebrs play active role in crime prevention
Bibliographic record
Abstract
HaiR-3R’s (Recognise, Respond and Refer) aims to promote gender equality by; Educating hairdressers to understand the link between gender inequality and family violence; Supporting hairdressers to champion and engage in conversations that challenge community attitudes that reinforce gender inequality; Supporting hairdressers to respond to family violence disclosures and refer to family violence services. Research reveals women develop unique, trusting bonds with their hairdressers. This relationship can lead to sharing beliefs and knowledge about gender inequality and experience of violence. An international review in Canada, the USA, New Zealand and Puerto Rico has found high levels of success in shifting community attitudes that support gender inequality. Eastern Domestic Violence Service (EDVOS-www.edvos.org.au) is the specialist family violence service in Melbourne’s eastern metropolitan region. EDVOS provides a broad range of integrated services to support women and children who are responding to family violence. Pre-Post training evaluation on HaiR-3R’s provided valuable quantitative and qualitative insights on how community members can play active role in crime prevention which will result in tangible difference and link to sustainable protective behaviour. EDVOS delivered innovative and internationally evidence-informed community family violence training to over 250 salon professionals within four months therefore will present learnings on: How community safety is linked with community development particularly around community education and training; HaiR–3R’s as an innovative approach to community education and training that will curve family violence/gendered violence rate as a crime prevention activity; International evidence on similar programs that have been successful in crime prevention (e.g. USA, Canada, Puerto Rico and New Zealand); How awareness on gender inequality and family violence can link to promoting community safety (qualitative and quantitative from 250 participants that attended HaiR–3R’s training); and Sustainability of the program with a focus on long–term behaviour change in promoting community safety.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.004 | 0.007 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Research integrity | 0.003 | 0.003 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.098 | 0.011 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".