MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2891613953 · doi:10.1109/lwc.2018.2869152

Joint Antenna Selection and Power Allocation for an Energy-efficient Massive MIMO System

2018· article· en· W2891613953 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueIEEE Wireless Communications Letters · 2018
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicAdvanced MIMO Systems Optimization
Canadian institutionsUniversity of British Columbia, Okanagan CampusUniversity of British Columbia
FundersChina Scholarship CouncilNational Natural Science Foundation of China
KeywordsTelecommunications linkMathematical optimizationPrecodingMIMOComputer scienceOptimization problemChannel state informationIterative methodEfficient energy useTransmitter power outputChannel (broadcasting)MathematicsWirelessTelecommunicationsTransmitterEngineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

A joint antenna selection and power allocation scheme is proposed for a downlink massive multiple-input multiple-output system under perfect channel state information. Based on a tractable lower bound of the achievable downlink rate with linear zero-forcing precoding, a nonconvex energy efficiency optimization problem is formulated with nonlinear constraints. Since the optimization variables are highly interrelated, it is impractical to directly derive the closed-form solution to the original problem. To solve this problem, an effective iterative algorithm that maximizes energy efficiency is proposed according to the Lagrangian dual method, where the optimal number of transmit antennas and power allocation are solved iteratively until convergence. Numerical results demonstrate the effectiveness of the proposed algorithm.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.865
Threshold uncertainty score0.813

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.018
GPT teacher head0.237
Teacher spread0.219 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it