MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Human papillomavirus (HPV)-associated malignancies as subsequent malignant neoplasms (SMN) in survivors of childhood cancer: A report from the Childhood Cancer Survivor Study (CCSS).

2017· article· en· W2891614702 on OpenAlexaff
Tara O. Henderson, Paul C. Nathan, John Whitton, Wendy M. Leisenring, Joseph Philip Neglia, Brynn Fowler, Michael Arnold, Rebecca M. Howell, Leslie L. Robison, Gregory T. Armstrong, Kenneth Alexander

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Clinical Oncology · 2017
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicCancer Diagnosis and Treatment
Canadian institutionsHospital for Sick Children
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineCumulative incidencePopulationCancerIncidence (geometry)EpidemiologyRectumOncologyInternal medicineConfidence intervalGynecologyCervixHPV infectionHazard ratioCervical cancerCohort

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

10566 Background: It is not known whether childhood cancer survivors (CCS) develop human papillomavirus (HPV)-associated malignancies more frequently than the general population. Methods: We assessed the cumulative incidence of SMN in sites typically associated with HPV (HPV-SMN) and evaluated standardized incidence ratios (SIR) and absolute excess risks (AER) using age-, sex- and calendar-year specific rates from the Surveillance, Epidemiology and End Results (SEER) program. Multivariate Cox regression models identified associations between key risk factors and HPV-SMN development. Results: Among 27,620 CCS, 36 developed an HPV-SMN at a median age of 27 years (range: 8-42) and a median of 15 years (range: 5-29) after their primary cancer. The 30-year cumulative incidence of an HPV-SMN was 0.20% (95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.13%-0.28%). HPV-SMN locations included oral cavity/pharynx (N = 26, 72%), rectum (N = 4, 11%), cervix/uteri (N = 3, 8%), and vulva (N = 3, 8%). The incidence of HPV-SMN was almost 3-fold higher among CCS than the general population (SIR = 2.8, 95% CI 2.0-4.1) with an AER of 6.0/100,000 person-years. Rates were elevated in those exposed (SIR = 3.3, CI 2.1-5.2) and not exposed to radiotherapy (RT; SIR = 2.6, CI 1.4-4.8). Risk of oral cavity/pharynx SMN was elevated in both those exposed (SIR = 7.3, CI 3.9-13.6) and not exposed (SIR = 4.2, CI 2.2-8.1) to head or neck RT, whereas, risk in GU locations was elevated in those exposed (SIR = 4.1, CI 1.9-9.2) but not in those not exposed to pelvic RT (SIR = 0.8, CI 0.3-2.1). Male sex (HR = 2.9, CI 1.3-6.1), exposure to head/neck/pelvic RT (HR = 2.6, CI 1.2-6.1), and platinum chemotherapy (HR = 6.1, CI: 2.6-13.9) increased the risk. Among 15 deceased HPV-SMN cases, 10 (67%) died of their HPV-SMN. Conclusions: While the overall incidence is low, CCS are at increased risk of developing malignancies in locations commonly associated with HPV infection in the general population. Further research examining the role of HPV in the etiology of these SMNs is warranted. As HPV-SMNs are potentially preventable, promotion of HPV vaccination efforts should be considered in this population.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.018
Threshold uncertainty score0.035

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.103
GPT teacher head0.458
Teacher spread0.355 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2017
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Clinical OncologySame topicCancer Diagnosis and TreatmentFrench-language works237,207