MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2891632433 · doi:10.5539/jas.v10n10p423

Computational System for Sizing Wind Energy Generation Systems Using Artificial Neural Networks

2018· article· en· W2891632433 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Rafael Gil Ferques, Carlos Eduardo Camargo Nogueira, Antonella Meneghetti, Djalene Maria Rocha

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Agricultural Science · 2018
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicEnergy Load and Power Forecasting
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsComputer scienceWind powerArtificial neural networkGridSizingJavaGenetic algorithmElectric power systemProcess (computing)Distributed computingReliability engineeringArtificial intelligencePower (physics)Machine learningOperating systemEngineeringElectrical engineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The objective of this work was to develop a computational application for the design of wind power generation systems in small-scale On-Grid and Off-Grid installations, using a user friendly and interactive process. Using artificial intelligence concepts in conjunction with genetic algorithms, to verify the technical and economic viability of the implementation of the wind power generation system. The application coding was done using the languages Java, C, C++ and the database in MySQL language, containing technical specifications and costs of components of a wind system (of this type of system). For the development of neural networks and genetic algorithms, the Encog library was used. The application has proven effective in designing and economic analysis of small wind systems, allowing fast and simple simulation of On-Grid systems and Off-Grid systems. In addition, it proved effective in storing and accessing the information regarding the simulations performed and in the comparison between them, in order to perform a new simulation. Also, it was reliable in the accomplishment of the economic analysis, returning in a clear form the feasibility or not of the implantation of the project.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.153
Threshold uncertainty score0.284

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.026
GPT teacher head0.228
Teacher spread0.202 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2018
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Agricultural ScienceSame topicEnergy Load and Power ForecastingFrench-language works237,207