MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2891647592 · doi:10.1190/geo2017-0642.1

Three-dimensional geosteering coherence attributes for deep-formation discontinuity detection

2018· article· en· W2891647592 on OpenAlexaff
Shangxu Wang, Sanyi Yuan, Tieyi Wang, Jianhu Gao, Shengjun Li

Bibliographic record

VenueGeophysics · 2018
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEarth and Planetary Sciences
TopicSeismic Imaging and Inversion Techniques
Canadian institutionsPetro-Canada
FundersNational Science and Technology Major Project
KeywordsCoherence (philosophical gambling strategy)Classification of discontinuitiesGeologyDiscontinuity (linguistics)Seismic tracePerpendicularSpatial coherenceWeightingSeismologyAlgorithmComputer scienceGeometryAcousticsArtificial intelligenceMathematicsWaveletMathematical analysis

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

ABSTRACT Deep-formation oil/gas exploration is a key objective in the geophysical field, and structural and stratigraphic discontinuities, such as faults and channels, usually contribute to the construction of traps and reservoirs. Coherence has been used successfully to identify these abnormal features in seismic amplitude volumes. However, the current coherence algorithms seldom involve the geologic concept. We propose geosteering coherence attributes by implementing the coherence calculation perpendicular to the direction of the structural trend in a 3D curved plane. We estimate a group of time lags between the original analysis trace and each original neighboring trace along a certain spatial direction by using dip scanning. For each spatial direction, we subsequently construct two new model traces by weighting phase traces derived from the complex seismic traces, in which time lags are eliminated. We then use the new model traces to compute the crosscorrelation coefficients for each spatial direction. We finally obtain the 3D geosteering coherence attributes by taking the minimum values among the modulus of the crosscorrelation coefficients along different spatial directions to approximately characterize the coherence perpendicular to the structural trend in a 3D curved plane. An example of the 3D physical modeling involving fracture groups and faults embedded in the deep formation is used to demonstrate the effectiveness of the 3D geosteering coherence attributes. The applications on two real 3D seismic data sets of sand reservoirs from western deep formation illustrate that our method can alleviate the influence of dipping strata and can highlight subtle structures. Compared to the conventional coherence method, our method can highlight subtle geologic structures more and better, suggesting that it may be serve as a future tool for detecting the distribution of geologic abnormalities in deep exploration.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.005

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0030.002
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.018
GPT teacher head0.215
Teacher spread0.198 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations31
Published2018
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueGeophysicsSame topicSeismic Imaging and Inversion TechniquesFrench-language works237,207