Phylogenetic approach to recover integration dates of latent HIV sequences within-host
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Given that HIV evolution and latent reservoir establishment occur continually within-host, and that latently infected cells can persist long-term, the HIV reservoir should comprise a genetically heterogeneous archive recapitulating within-host HIV evolution. However, this has yet to be conclusively demonstrated, in part due to the challenges of reconstructing within-host reservoir establishment dynamics over long timescales. We developed a phylogenetic framework to reconstruct the integration dates of individual latent HIV lineages. The framework first involves inference and rooting of a maximum-likelihood phylogeny relating plasma HIV RNA sequences serially sampled before the initiation of suppressive antiretroviral therapy, along with putative latent sequences sampled thereafter. A linear model relating root-to-tip distances of plasma HIV RNA sequences to their sampling dates is used to convert root-to-tip distances of putative latent lineages to their establishment (integration) dates. Reconstruction of the ages of putative latent sequences sampled from chronically HIV-infected individuals up to 10 y following initiation of suppressive therapy revealed a genetically heterogeneous reservoir that recapitulated HIV's within-host evolutionary history. Reservoir sequences were interspersed throughout multiple within-host lineages, with the oldest dating to >20 y before sampling; historic genetic bottleneck events were also recorded therein. Notably, plasma HIV RNA sequences isolated from a viremia blip in an individual receiving otherwise suppressive therapy were highly genetically diverse and spanned a 20-y age range, suggestive of spontaneous in vivo HIV reactivation from a large latently infected cell pool. Our framework for reservoir dating provides a potentially powerful addition to the HIV persistence research toolkit.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.003 | 0.010 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.003 | 0.003 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".