Unified platform for multimodal voxel-based analysis to evaluate tumour perfusion and diffusion characteristics before and after radiation treatment evaluated in metastatic brain cancer
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Objective: Early changes in tumour behaviour following stereotactic radiosurgery) are potential biomarkers of response. To-date quantitative model-based measures of dynamic contrast-enhanced (DCE) and diffusion-weighted (DW) MRI parameters have shown widely variable findings, which may be attributable to variability in image acquisition, post-processing and analysis. Big data analytic approaches are needed for the automation of computationally intensive modelling calculations for every voxel, independent of observer interpretation. Methods: This unified platform is a voxel-based, multimodality architecture that brings complimentary solute transport processes such as perfusion and diffusion into a common framework. The methodology was tested on synthetic data and digital reference objects and consequently evaluated in patients who underwent volumetric DCE-CT, DCE-MRI and DWI-MRI scans before and after treatment. Three-dimensional pharmacokinetic parameter maps from both modalities were compared as well as the correlation between apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) values and the extravascular, extracellular volume (Ve). Comparison of histogram parameters was done via Bland–Altman analysis, as well as Student’s t-test and Pearson’s correlation using two-sided analysis. Results: System testing on synthetic Tofts model data and digital reference objects recovered the ground truth parameters with mean relative percent error of 1.07 × 10−7 and 5.60 × 10−4 respectively. Direct voxel-to-voxel Pearson’s analysis showed statistically significant correlations between CT and MR which peaked at Day 7 for Ktrans (R = 0.74, p <= 0.0001). Statistically significant correlations were also present between ADC and Ve derived from both DCE-MRI and DCE-CT with highest median correlations found at Day 3 between median ADC and Ve,MRI values (R = 0.6, p < 0.01) The strongest correlation to DCE-CT measurements was found with DCE-MRI analysis using voxelwise T10 maps (R = 0.575, p < 0.001) instead of assigning a fixed T10 value. Conclusion: The unified implementation of multiparametric transport modelling allowed for more robust and timely observer-independent data analytics. Utility of a common analysis platform has shown higher correlations between pharmacokinetic parameters obtained from different modalities than has previously been reported. Advances in knowledge: Utility of a common analysis platform has shown statistically higher correlations between pharmacokinetic parameters obtained from different modalities than has previously been reported.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.003 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".