MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2891730423 · doi:10.7202/1050994ar

Sur les traces de l’épithèque de Provancher au mont Yamaska (Odonata : Corduliidae : Neurocordulia yamaskanensis)

2018· article· fr· W2891730423 on OpenAlexafffundvenueabout
Alain Mochon, Michel Savard

Bibliographic record

VenueLe Naturaliste canadien · 2018
Typearticle
Languagefr
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicSpecies Distribution and Climate Change
Canadian institutionsCentre Intégré Universitaire de Santé et de Services Sociaux du Saguenay–Lac-Saint-Jean
FundersUniversité Laval
KeywordsHumanitiesArt

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

L’épithèque de Provancher (Neurocordulia yamaskanensis) a fait l’objet en 2017 d’une investigation au pied du mont Yamaska, dans le cours lent et sinueux de la rivière Noire, située à Saint-Pie, en Montérégie. Il s’agit de la localité type de l’espèce, découverte il y a plus de 140 ans par l’abbé Léon Provancher, et qui n’avait pas été explorée depuis sur le plan odonatologique. La collecte d’exuvies et l’observation d’adultes ont montré qu’une population de l’espèce est toujours présente dans l’environnement du mont Yamaska. Cette libellule discrète, rarement observée au Québec, passe généralement inaperçue en raison de ses moeurs strictement crépusculaires. Ce retour aux sources de la découverte de Provancher, en 1875, se veut un clin d’oeil à son oeuvre durable qui persiste par l’intermédiaire de sa revue Le Naturaliste canadien qui souligne, en 2018, son 150e anniversaire.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.887
Threshold uncertainty score0.225

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0030.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0040.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.023
GPT teacher head0.233
Teacher spread0.210 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2018
Admission routes4
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueLe Naturaliste canadienSame topicSpecies Distribution and Climate ChangeFrench-language works237,207