MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W2891731124 · doi:10.1149/2.0861811jes

Numerical and Experimental Investigations of Bipolar Membrane Fuel Cells: 3D Model Development and Effect of Gas Channel Width

2018· article· en· W2891731124 on OpenAlexaff
Jian Gong, Qiushi Li, Pang‐Chieh Sui, Ned Djilali, Zhiping Li, Yan Xiang, Shanfu Lu

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of The Electrochemical Society · 2018
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicFuel Cells and Related Materials
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Victoria
FundersFundamental Research Funds for the Central UniversitiesNational Natural Science Foundation of China
KeywordsMultiphysicsCathodeMechanicsTransport phenomenaProton exchange membrane fuel cellMembraneChemistryMembrane electrode assemblyElectrochemistryMaterials scienceElectrodeBiological systemThermodynamicsPhysicsFinite element methodAnodePhysical chemistry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Bipolar membrane fuel cells, which features a hybrid acid-alkaline membrane architecture, show great potential for practical applications because of their ability for self-humidification during operation. The principle of self-humidification behavior and associated transport mechanisms are reported in previous studies with reduced-dimension models. This paper reports on a three-dimensional model and new experimental data that further elucidate the mechanism of self-humidification, provide detailed characterization of the effects of design parameters on flow field and cell performance. The multidimensional-multiphysics model accounts for interface reaction kinetics, as well as transport of gas species, charged species and momentum. Simulations and quantitative analysis are performed for the cathode catalyst layer where water transport is critical for the electrochemical reaction therein. Three-dimensional model fully captures geometric features and gradients, and offers more comprehensive resolution of mass transport inside the cell. Based on the three-dimensional model, effects of channel width on cell performance are investigated both numerically and experimentally.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.010
Threshold uncertainty score0.019

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0020.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.005
GPT teacher head0.197
Teacher spread0.192 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations9
Published2018
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of The Electrochemical Society→Same topicFuel Cells and Related Materials→French-language works237,207→