MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W289180647

MADRID-MURCIA: LA PERCEPCIÓN COSMOPOLITA DEL ARTE DE LA PERIFERIA (1915-1926)

2014· article· es· W289180647 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
José Luis Lucas

Bibliographic record

VenueMurgetana · 2014
Typearticle
Languagees
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicSpanish History and Politics
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsQuarter (Canadian coin)HumanitiesArtPeriod (music)GeographyArchaeology
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

During the first quarter of the 20th century, the Spanish colonies having been lost, Madrid was forced to rekindle its relations with the peninsular regions and nationalities that were gaining new momentum thanks to their socio-economic strength and regenerationist spirit. In this article we will analyse this centre-periphery relationship, through the Art news and announcements regarding Murcia collected in the annual El Ano Artistico, published in Madrid by the art critic Jose Frances between 1915 and 1926, complemented by illustrations taken from ‘Revista La Esfera’, a weekly publication from the same period.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.030
Threshold uncertainty score0.059

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0020.004
Scholarly communication0.0030.001
Open science0.0000.002
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0060.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.013
GPT teacher head0.244
Teacher spread0.231 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2014
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueMurgetanaSame topicSpanish History and PoliticsFrench-language works237,207