Modern Developments in the Chemistry of Homoenolates
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Homoenolates are unique synthetic intermediates which display umpolung reactivity. Homoenolates and homoenolate equivalents like cyclopropanols have seen a recent surge in popularity due to their particular utility for accessing β‐functionalized carbonyl derivatives. This popularity has been enabled by the development of protocols for facile access to cyclopropanols and homoenolates from a variety of readily available starting materials. This microreview will highlight common strategies for generating cyclopropanols and metal homoenolates, as well as procedures for homoenolate functionalization, with a particular emphasis on protocols that have appeared after 2003. As an amphoteric molecule, two main reactivity modes have been established: the homoenolate reacts as a carbon nucleophile for β‐functionalization reactions and/or as a carbonyl electrophile, a strategy which has only emerged in the past few years. This microreview will highlight the use of homoenolates as convenient intermediates for accessing especially challenging motifs. The use of homoenolate chemistry in the context of natural product and pharmaceutical synthesis will also be presented.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.007 | 0.004 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".