MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2891960004 · doi:10.2514/1.g003485

Linear Structural Dynamics and Tip-Vane Attitude Control for Square Solar Sails

2018· article· en· W2891960004 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.
fundA Canadian funder is recorded on the work.

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Guidance Control and Dynamics · 2018
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicSpacecraft Dynamics and Control
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Toronto
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
KeywordsSolar sailFinite element methodBoomDiagonalSquare (algebra)Aerospace engineeringSpacecraftComputer sciencePhysicsControl theory (sociology)Structural engineeringEngineeringMathematicsGeometryControl (management)

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This Paper presents a linear model for a square solar sail spacecraft containing four pretensioned triangular sails supported by four flexible diagonal booms. The structural dynamics of the stretched sails and diagonal booms is explored by using a two-stage model including a static finite element or analytic model to solve for the sails in-plane stresses due to prestretching and a dynamic finite element model to calculate the in- and out-of-plane deflections of the interconnected sails and booms. The dynamic finite element model takes into account the effect of in-plane stresses, which are calculated by the static finite element or analytic model. Once the structural dynamic model is established, different modal cost analyses are used to evaluate and rank elastic modes of the solar sail. Two attitude controllers are developed for the solar sail, and the controller/structure interactions are studied using the linear model and considering an attitude maneuver.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.904
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.004
GPT teacher head0.220
Teacher spread0.217 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it