MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2891968841 · doi:10.1016/j.jsams.2018.09.003

International Congress on Soldiers’ Physical Performance 2017 (ICSPP2017) Special Issue

2018· editorial· en· W2891968841 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Dan C. Billing, Jace R. Drain, Jeremy Witchalls

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of science and medicine in sport · 2018
Typeeditorial
Languageen
FieldHealth Professions
TopicOccupational Health and Performance
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPreparednessAttendanceMedical educationPsychologyEngineeringMedicineApplied psychologyPolitical science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This special issue of the Journal of Science and Medicine in Sport originates from the 4th International Congress of Soldiers’ Physical Performance (ICSPP2017) which was hosted by the Defence Science and Technology Group in Melbourne, Australia from 28 November to 1 December 2017. The ICSPP is the most important international conference in applied military human performance research and therefore attracts experts from all over the world. ICSPP2017 had a record attendance of 502 delegates from 32 countries (Fig. 1). ICSPP2017 included 8 invited keynote lectures (Table 1), 23 featured science session, 17 oral free communication sessions, 9 thematic oral poster sessions, and 3 poster free communication sessions. In addition, an interactive case study on dismounted soldier performance assessment and a roundtable on resilience for military readiness and preparedness was conducted. Overall, the topics covered were comprehensive and included physical training programs and adaptations, occupational and physical performance testing and assessment, injury prevention, public health practices, nutritional considerations, human factors, ergonomics, equipment design, biomechanics, load carriage, gender integration issues, environmental issues, health promotion and wellness, deployment concerns, pedagogy, psychological, and cognitive factors, leadership, and social factors. Accepted congress abstracts were made available through an online Journal of Science and Medicine in Sport supplement.1ICSPP2017 Abstracts J Sci Med Sport. 2017; 20: S1-S178PubMed Google ScholarTable 1Invited keynote speakers for the 4th International Congress on Soldiers’ Physical Performance.SpeakerPresentation titleProfessor Romain Meeusen (BEL)The underlying mechanisms of overtraining and management strategies in the military environmentDr Bruce Jones (US)Managing musculoskeletal injuries in the military environmentProfessor Heikki Kyröläinen (FIN)Optimising physical training adaptations and military performanceProfessor Sam Marcora (UK)Limits to exercise tolerance in humans – mind over muscle?Professor Maria Fiatarone-Singh (AUS)Resistance training, it’s a no brainer…Professor Louise Burke (AUS)Supporting training and performance in the military environment through nutrition and supplementationDr Karl Friedl (US)Role and benefits of wearable physiological sensors in the militaryAssociate Professor Thor Besier (NZ)The application of wearable technologies in the military context Open table in a new tab This special issue contains 9 manuscripts focused on aspects of military physical performance. Three manuscripts are invited reviews from ICSPP2017 keynote speakers and cover important topic areas which have been developed and refined through many years of primary research in the military context, including, optimising training adaptations and performance (Kyröläinen et al., Finland), a public health approach to prevent musculoskeletal injuries (Jones et al., United States of America) and physiological monitoring (Friedl, United States of America). The special issue also contains 2 invited manuscripts which provide important methodological guidance in the military context for the testing and evaluation of exoskeletons (Mudie et al., Australia) and for the development of organisation-wide physical employment standards (Carstairs et al., Australia). Two further papers are dedicated to important areas of primary research including the variability in physical fitness adaptations during military training (Burley et al., Australia) and the association between obesity related health risk and fitness test results (Sanderson et al., United Kingdom). The final 2 manuscripts present important international perspectives on resilience for military readiness and preparedness (Nindl et al., United States of America) and military research priorities and gaps (Lovalekar et al., United States of America). The later manuscript provides important guidance to researchers and practitioners about the current and future research priorities across the service members operational lifecycle. The articles in this issue identify some of the latest findings, methodologies and international perspectives pertinent to military physical performance. The manuscripts add to the knowledge-base and provide guidance on how to leverage and translate human performance research well beyond the military, with applications in many other physically demanding occupations and to sport. As such, the Journal of Science and Medicine in Sport is pleased to be able to publish high quality research in the field of military human performance. Synergies of research methodology and the focus on human performance outcomes have resulted in increasing dialogue between military and sport researchers. The dual focuses of the journal, namely sport science and sports medicine, are highly relevant to the military environment, where enhanced human performance and reduced injury risk are as critical to mission success as they would be to sports performance. Through an Agreement of Cooperation between the Defence Science and Technology (DST) Group and the International Military Sports Council (CISM) for ICSPP2017 a number of congress awards and travel grants were established. The congress awards acknowledge the outstanding contributions of individuals and organizations and recognises excellence in military physical and physiological performance research. Recipients of each award are provided in Table 2. The inaugural ICSPP–CISM Lifetime Achievement Award was awarded to Dr Karl Friedl (United States of America). Karl has inspired, provided strong leadership and positively influenced other researchers from around the world over several decades, and in doing so has served to advance soldiers’ physical performance on an international scale.Table 2Recipients of the inaugural International Congress on Soldiers’ Physical Performance (ICSPP) – International Military Sports Council (CISM) Awards.AwardRecipientICSPP–CISM Lifetime Achievement Award•Karl Friedl (United States of America) – Recognising leadership and distinguished service across a lifetime in military physical and physiological performance research.ICSPP–CISM Best Oral Presentation Award•Thor Anders Kilen (Denmark) – The effect of training frequency and initial training status on adaptation amongst basic army conscripts.ICSPP–CISM Best Thematic Oral Poster Presentation Award•Heather Bowes (Australia) – A contribution to understanding the impact of variations in body mass on fractioning the metabolic burden of military load carriage.ICSPP–CISM Best Poster Presentation Award•Christopher Vine (United Kingdom) – A job task analysis to quantify the physical demands of load carriage duties conducted by ground close combat roles in the UK Armed Forces.ICSPP–CISM Student Travel Grant Awards•Shawn Eagle (United States of America) – Asymmetrical landing patters combined with heavier body mass increases lower extremity injury risk in Special Operation forces.•Anne Beethe (United States of America) – Comparing lower extremity strength with aerobic and anaerobic capacity to predict novice combat swimmer 500 m time trial performance.•Lopes Thiago (Brazil) – Phase one of a musculoskeletal injury prediction model validation: a prospective study in Navy cadets.•Jeremy McAdam (United States of America) – Impact of whey protein supplementation on fitness performance, body composition and injury rates in Army initial entry soldiers.•Nilton Gomes Rolim Filho (Brazil) – Serum creatine kinase and immune system relationship in different Brazilian biomes during the 2012 Commandos Special Operations Course. Open table in a new tab As guest editors, we are confident that you will find papers in this supplement of scientific substance and of military relevance. Finally, we encourage your attendance and participation at ICSPP2020 from 11 to 14 February 2020 in Quebec City, Canada (http://www.icspp2020.ca/).

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.005
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Editorial · Consensus signal: Editorial
Teacher disagreement score0.212
Threshold uncertainty score0.970

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0050.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.002
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.045
GPT teacher head0.474
Teacher spread0.429 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEditorial

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2018
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of science and medicine in sportSame topicOccupational Health and PerformanceFrench-language works237,207