MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2891970239 · doi:10.1136/eb-2018-102948

‘Rooming-in’ could be an effective non-pharmacological treatment for infants with neonatal abstinence syndrome

2018· letter· en· W2891970239 on OpenAlex
Karen McQueen

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueEvidence-Based Nursing · 2018
Typeletter
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicPrenatal Substance Exposure Effects
Canadian institutionsLakehead University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsAbstinenceMedicinePediatricsPsychologyPsychiatry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Commentary on : MacMillan, KDL. et al . Association of rooming-in with outcomes for neonatal abstinence syndrome: a systematic review with meta-analysis. JAMA Pediatr . 2018; 172; 345-351. The prevalence of neonatal abstinence syndrome (NAS) has increased globally, placing a significant strain on healthcare resources. Newborns with NAS typically receive care in the neonatal intensive care unit (NICU). Recent studies have identified that NAS treatment in the NICU may be associated with longer length of stay, more severe withdrawal and lower rates of breast feeding compared with rooming-in care where mothers and infants remain …

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.433
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.043
GPT teacher head0.349
Teacher spread0.306 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it