Physiochemical characterization and support interaction of alumina‐supported heteropolyacid catalyst for biodiesel production
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract 12‐Tungstophosphoric acid (TPA)‐supported γ‐Al 2 O 3 catalysts were synthesized with varying TPA loadings. Catalysts characteristics were determined using Brunauer–Emmett–Teller surface area analysis, thermogravimetric analyses, X‐ray diffraction, Raman, pyridine‐adsorbed Fourier‐transform infrared spectroscopy, and 13 C hpdec (high‐power 1 H decoupling) nuclear magnetic resonance, whereas surface morphology was studied using scanning electron microscope and transmission electron microscopy analyses. Surface defects were found in the catalyst with higher TPA loadings (55–65 wt.%). The presence of WO x was observed at higher loadings and later agglomerated into tungsten oxide crystals. The TPA impregnated catalysts were investigated for biodiesel synthesis from canola oil. The reaction was found to be independent of mass transfer limitation. The activation energy was 33.6 kJ mol −1 , and pre‐exponential factor was 7.3*10 −2 min −1 . The turnover frequency for the supported catalysts was found in the range of 9.7*10 −4 –8.8*10 −2 min −1 . A conversion of 94.9 ± 2.3% was obtained under the optimized conditions, that is, 10 wt.% of the catalyst loading, 17.5 methanol to oil molar ratio, 4 MPa, and at 200°C in 10 hr.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it