MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2892033470

Beyond Sentimentality: “Tale” of an Alternate Bhadramahila Refugee

2018· article· en· W2892033470 on OpenAlexaffvenue
Sarbani Banerjee

Bibliographic record

VenuePostcolonial text · 2018
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicSouth Asian Studies and Diaspora
Canadian institutionsWestern University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsBengaliRefugeeEmotiveSentimentalityMainstreamMemoirIdentity (music)AestheticsGender studiesLiteratureSociologyHistoryAnthropologyArtPhilosophyLinguisticsArchaeologyTheology
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In this paper, I read Sunanda Sikdar’s memoir Doyamoyeer Katha ( Doyamoyee’s Tale , 2008, Bengali) and study how an East Bengali immigrant woman presents her perceptions beyond the nationalistic history as well as the key motifs of Bengali refugee past. I examine the development of Doyamoyee’s heterogeneous identity and emphasize the importance of revisiting stereotypical and canonical artworks produced by the immigrant bhadralok, through juxtaposing these works with non-bhadralok refugee experiences. The mainstream writings have emotionally used the Partition memory and repeatedly tinted everyday realities of rural East Bengal with identical cliches, whereas Sikdar’s writings, as I argue, are based on the absence of typified emotive tropes. By understanding the category to which Doyamoyee belongs and studying her heretical perspectives, this paper demonstrates the difficulties of confining her identity into a fixed category of refugee-ness as belonging to the middle-class.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.011
Threshold uncertainty score0.015

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0110.012
Scholarly communication0.0060.004
Open science0.0010.004
Research integrity0.0010.003
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0040.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.020
GPT teacher head0.271
Teacher spread0.251 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2018
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuePostcolonial textSame topicSouth Asian Studies and DiasporaFrench-language works237,207