Did Savary of Mauléon participate in Alfonso IX’s failed siege of Caceres 1218?
Bibliographic record
Abstract
espanolEste trabajo evalua la evidencia existente acerca de la posibilidad de que Savary de Mauleon hubiese estado presente en el intento de conquista de la ciudad de Caceres por el rey Alfonso IX de Leon en el otono de 1218. Este trabajo tambien explica cuales son las posibles razones que llevaron a este mercenario poitevino a participar en las guerras ibericas contra los Almohades. Tambien intenta contextualizar la supuesta participacion de Savary en la peninsula iberica en relacion con su carrera politica y militar, antes y despues de su participacion en la Quinta Cruzada. EnglishThis paper assesses the evidence on whether Savary of Mauleon could have been present in the attempted conquest of Caceres by King Alfonso IX of Leon around the autumn of 1218. This paper furthermore explains, what were the possible reasons that might have encouraged the participation of this Poitevin mercenary in Iberian wars against the Almohads. It also attempts to contextualise Savary’s alleged involvement in Iberia in relation to his political and military career before and after the events of the Fifth Crusade.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.007 | 0.003 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.003 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.008 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".