MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2892073134 · doi:10.1177/026248930602500501

Control of the Structure and Morphology for Production of Novel LDPE Acoustical Foams

2006· article· en· W2892073134 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueCellular Polymers · 2006
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMaterials Science
TopicPolymer Foaming and Composites
Canadian institutionsUniversité de SherbrookeUniversity of Toronto
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMaterials scienceLow-density polyethyleneComposite materialPorosityMorphology (biology)Expansion ratioFoaming agentAbsorption (acoustics)Cell structurePorous mediumPolyethylene

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This paper discusses the control of the foaming process for production of variable microcellular structures and morphologies for novel acoustical foams under investigation. For that purpose, the foaming process was controlled for production of foam samples with various microcellular structures. Crosslinked LDPE was used as a base material for the produced foams. Very high open-cell content (ranging between 43 – 95%), high microcellular cell densities (9×10 8 – 1.6×10 9 cells/cm 3 ) and desired expansion ratios (3 – 9 folds) were successfully obtained. While the material is overly porous, it is noted that the unfoamed skins on the outer surfaces of the samples have prevented sound waves from penetrating the samples. Manual skin removal resulted in slight improvement in sound absorption testing. However, in order to get more reliable data, skinless samples need to be produced.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.015
Threshold uncertainty score0.236

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.006
GPT teacher head0.201
Teacher spread0.195 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it