Bibliographic record
Abstract
Cet article observe la dynamique narrative du roman Frères, de David Clerson, publié en 2013 chez Héliotrope, comme une configuration créatrice d’épisodes reconnaissables et de motifs recyclés provenant tout à la fois des contes (naissance singulière, main coupée, enveloppement dans une peau de bête, odyssée, mort temporaire, etc.) et de scripts rituels à l’oeuvre dans les codes socioculturels qui régissent les manières de faire les jeunes garçons dans nos sociétés occidentales (rites de passage, « voie des oiseaux », ensauvagement). Contrairement au conte, qui organise des séquences d’actions rituelles accomplies et réussies, et à rebours du rite, dont la finalité est l’agrégation à la communauté, le roman met l’accent sur les échecs de la socialisation comprise dans son sens anthropologique comme une initiation aux différences des sexes et des âges. S’il s’alimente aux trésors des contes et aux logiques initiatiques, c’est pour dire et explorer, par des voies autres, la violence du réel, les difficiles traversées des gués dangereux de l’existence, la fin d’un monde et les désordres de la filiation.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.005 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.010 | 0.020 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.007 | 0.005 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.006 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.004 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.018 | 0.002 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".