Bibliographic record
Abstract
Cet article traite des conséquences préjudiciables de certaines pratiques patrimoniales dans les relations de groupes au long de l’histoire humaine. Son objectif est de mettre en évidence les conflits intergroupes qui sont enflammés par le patrimoine. En tant que bien symbolique assurant prestige et avantages à ceux qui le possèdent, le patrimoine a servi depuis des temps immémoriaux à mobiliser la population pour obtenir des gains stratégiques lors des conflits. Il n’est certainement ni la source ni la cause de la plupart des conflits, mais lorsqu’un conflit se déroule, enflammer les sentiments par l’excitation du patrimoine contribue à élever le niveau d’engagement des membres du groupe impliqué. L’utilisation du patrimoine pour attiser les comportements conflictuels provoque évidemment des dommages aux groupes impliqués, mais en même temps évite au patrimoine de perdre complètement son pouvoir de générer ou de maintenir la cohésion socioculturelle.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.005 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".