MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2892136276 · doi:10.29244/jam.6.1.1-14

Faktor-faktor yang Memengaruhi Keberhasilan Usaha Mustahik pada Program Zakat Produktif di LAZ An-Nuur

2018· article· id· W2892136276 on OpenAlexaff
Hardinata Muhammad, Deni Lubis, Dedi Budiman Hakim

Bibliographic record

VenueAl-Muzara ah · 2018
Typearticle
Languageid
FieldBusiness, Management and Accounting
TopicIslamic Finance and Banking Studies
Canadian institutionsWiLAN (Canada)
Fundersnot available
KeywordsGovernment (linguistics)PovertyPopulationBusinessLogistic regressionEmpowermentAccountingEconomic growthEconomicsStatisticsSociologyDemographyMathematics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The high level of poverty in Indonesia becomes one of the problems that have not been successfully overcame by the government.Bogor Regency is the district with the poorest population in West Java Province in 2016.Many programs have been undertaken to overcome these problems by government of Bogor Regency.One of them is by optimizing the utilization of productive zakat conducted by Lembaga Amil Zakat (LAZ).LAZ An-Nuur established mustahik empowerment program by providing productive zakat in the form of financing for entrepreneurship.This study aims to analyze the factors that influence the success of a mustahik's business in utilizing the productive zakat given by LAZ An-Nuur.The method used in this research is descriptive analysis and logistic regression analysis.Respondents in this study consisted of 48 beneficiaries of productive zakat funds.The results show that the factors that proved to influence the success of LAZ An-Nuur mustahik's business are the age, length of business, business profits, and the frequency of financing.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.016
Threshold uncertainty score0.053

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0020.001
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0160.003

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.018
GPT teacher head0.261
Teacher spread0.243 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations7
Published2018
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueAl-Muzara ahSame topicIslamic Finance and Banking StudiesFrench-language works237,207