The Development of Intra-Quarter Territories of the Historical Center of St. Petersburg with Consideration of Consumer Activity of the Population
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Prospects for the development of the historical center of St Petersburg are considered. The specifics of its residential quarters housing are revealed, which occupies more than a thousand hectares and is based on the use of two contrasting morphotypes - exterior and intra-quarter. There is a tendency to use intra-quarter territories for public purposes. The difficulties encountered in the implementation of the variant in which the open courtyards were the key object are analyzed. A tendency for spontaneous privatization and the passive use of household plots are fixed, which results in their exclusion from the urbanization process. Passivity of administrative bodies is noted in the absence of effective financial and legal instruments for regulating urban development The concept of arrangement of intra-quarter passages (a variant of the popular St Petersburg courtyards) is proposed. Their system is designed to compensate for thelow density of the street network in the center of St Petersburg and improve the conditions of pedestrian communications. The basis for the implementation of such projects may be intra-quarter depressive sites. There is a possibility for accommodation of various objects of social infrastructure along the transport routes, designed for the conditions of passing services. It is proposed to take into account the successful experience of entrance courtyards usage on the territory of blocks and the development of roofs for excursions. It is assumed that this approach can attract private investment to rehabilitate depressed areas.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".