MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2892163682 · doi:10.4324/9781315776194-6

Toronto’s Changing Neighborhoods

2015· book-chapter· en· W2892163682 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Katharine N. Rankin, Kuni Kamizaki, Heather McLean

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typebook-chapter
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicUrban Planning and Governance
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsGeography

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Toronto city is recognized as one of the most diverse cities in the world as a result of a half century of immigration from Europe, the Caribbean, Asia, Africa, and Central and South America. As transnational spaces of consumption and exchange, commercial strips play a key role in maintaining the cultural identity and socio-economic stability of neighborhoods. Some commercial streets in Toronto have created thematic street signs and street festivals that mark and celebrate the area's ethnic identity. Evidence of gentrification in Toronto through the arrival of high-end businesses, planning processes suggests that affordable commercial spaces are protected without organized community response or planning intervention. Business owners providing affordable goods and services on disinvested local shopping streets, particularly those who are newly immigrated, continue to be excluded from planning for the future. The awareness of a potential for displacement opens the door to questioning market-driven processes of commercial change.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: Other
Teacher disagreement score0.738
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0060.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.059
GPT teacher head0.309
Teacher spread0.250 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations5
Published2015
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicUrban Planning and GovernanceFrench-language works237,207