Periplum petroleum : une anthropologie de trottoirs en (non)milieu plastique
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Cette recherche est une invitation à repenser ce(ux) qui constituent l’humain et de manière plus large le vivant en s’intéressant à la manière dont le non-humain a priori inanimé, ici la matière plastique, dans son couplage avec l’humain, devient force d’animation. Je pose la question suivante : comment est-ce que l’introduction du medium plastique reconfigure le tissu de relations composant le territoire et ainsi un mode d’existence humaine ? À l’occasion d’un terrain multi-ligne qui a eu lieu entre Ottawa et Montréal, j’ai suivi la circulation du pétrole ainsi que sa signification dans sa concrétion plastique. Je me suis mise à l’écoute des bruits émergeant d’une f(r)iction pétromoderne et suis moi-même entrée dans un devenir-visqueux en interférant avec le milieu pour le révéler. Je suggère dans ce texte que le régime plastique est un régime de transparence, d’abstraction, qui se soustrait aux regards et reconfigure la response-abilité à la matière.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.004 | 0.009 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.004 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.006 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".