MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2892197613 · doi:10.2214/ajr.17.19226

Attenuation and Degree of Enhancement With Conventional 120-kVp Polychromatic CT and 70-keV Monochromatic Rapid Kilovoltage-Switching Dual-Energy CT in Cystic and Solid Renal Masses

2018· article· en· W2892197613 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueAmerican Journal of Roentgenology · 2018
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicAdvanced X-ray and CT Imaging
Canadian institutionsOttawa Hospital
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMonochromatic colorMedicineNuclear medicineAttenuationDual energyRadiologyOpticsPhysicsPathology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to compare attenuation values (in Hounsfield units) and degree of enhancement (attenuation change) in renal masses using 120-kVp polychromatic (conventional) CT and 70-keV monochromatic dual-energy CT (DECT). MATERIALS AND METHODS: Twenty-two patients with 39 renal masses (24 Bosniak category I and II cysts and 15 solid masses under active surveillance) underwent conventional CT (120-kVp unenhanced and contrast-enhanced CT) and rapid kilovoltage-switching DECT (120-kVp unenhanced CT and 70-keV contrast-enhanced CT). The mean (± SD) time between scans was 648 ± 943 days. A radiologist measured attenuation on matched image sets coregistered between examinations. Absolute attenuation and attenuation change were compared using independent t tests, Pearson correlation, and Bland-Altman analysis. RESULTS: There was no difference in attenuation on 120-kVp versus 70-keV contrast-enhanced CT images for cysts (9.5 ± 5.5 HU [range, -2 to 20 HU] vs 10.1 ± 4.6 HU [range, -2 to 16 HU]; p = 0.33) and solid masses (110.1 ± 72.9 HU [range, 35-267 HU] vs 119.1 ± 73.7 HU [range, 33-265 HU]; p = 0.04). There also was no difference in attenuation change for 120-kVp contrast-enhanced CT minus 120-kVp unenhanced CT (cysts, 3.5 ± 3.9 HU [range, -2 to 13 HU]; solid masses, 80.7 ± 73.3 HU [range, 9-227 HU]; p = 0.45) or for 70-keV contrast-enhanced CT minus 120-kVp unenhanced CT (cysts, 4.3 ± 4.1 HU [range, -3 to 12 HU]; solid masses, 89.8 ± 74.1 HU [range, 7-226 HU]; p = 0.04). The correlation was strong to almost perfect (β = 0.83-0.98) with substantial agreement. There was no difference in attenuation of cysts and solid masses comparing 120-kVp acquisitions acquired at different time points (p = 0.20-0.92). The correlation was strong to almost perfect (β = 0.72-0.95) with substantial agreement. CONCLUSION: There are no differences in absolute attenuation or degree of enhancement comparing 70-keV monochromatic CT to conventional 120-kVp CT in renal cysts and solid masses.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.399
Threshold uncertainty score0.594

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.008
GPT teacher head0.233
Teacher spread0.224 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it