Incidentally found hyperreactio luteinalis in pregnancy
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Hyperreactio luteinalis (HL) is a rare pregnancy-related condition in which the ovaries become massively enlarged bilaterally, occupied by multiple benign theca lutein cysts, secondary to increased ovarian stimulation by beta-human chorionic gonadotropin (B-hCG). HL should resolve spontaneously postpartum, however, their occurrence has led some physicians unfamiliar with the natural history of the condition to perform unnecessary ovarian cystectomies or oophorectomies. A healthy 32-year-old woman was incidentally found to have new onset multicystic ovaries on ultrasound at 31 + 3 weeks gestational age, which continued to enlarge, with a maximum volume of ∼448.0 cm3 and ∼323.5 cm3 in right and left ovaries, respectively. She also developed signs and symptoms of hyperandrogenism, and later abdominal pain which ultimately expedited delivery. This paper demonstrates that familiarity with HL as a clinical entity, its typical presentation and natural history, and targeting conservative management is paramount in minimizing iatrogenic harm by obstetricians given the increased use of ultrasound in pregnancy. Patients presenting after the first trimester with bilateral multicystic ovaries with a "spoke wheel" appearance on ultrasound, hyperandrogenism, abnormally elevated B-hCG, or symptoms consistent with elevated B-hCG should prompt a possible diagnosis.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.004 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".