MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2892242347 · doi:10.1111/gwmr.12298

Infiltration of Sulfate to Enhance Sulfate‐Reducing Biodegradation of Petroleum Hydrocarbons

2018· article· en· W2892242347 on OpenAlexfundno aff
Yunxiao Wei, Neil R. Thomson, Ramón Aravena, Massimo Marchesi, James F. Barker, Eugene L. Madsen, Ravi Kolhatkar, Tim Buscheck, Daniel Hunkeler, Christopher M. DeRito

Bibliographic record

VenueGroundwater Monitoring & Remediation · 2018
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicMicrobial bioremediation and biosurfactants
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaAmerican Petroleum Institute
KeywordsSulfateBiodegradationAquiferEnvironmental remediationEnvironmental chemistryInfiltration (HVAC)PetroleumGroundwaterContaminationEnvironmental scienceEnvironmental engineeringChemistryGeologyGeotechnical engineeringEcology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract The lack of sufficient electron acceptors, particularly sulfate, can limit the rate of biodegradation of petroleum hydrocarbons (PHCs). Hence, there is a growing interest by remediation practitioners to deliver sulfate to a PHC impacted saturated zone to enhance biodegradation. When shallow contamination is present in a relatively permeable aquifer and site constraints allow, a cost‐effective approach is to apply sulfate on the ground surface. In this investigation a pilot‐scale experiment was conducted to increase our understanding of the delivery of sulfate using a surface‐based method and the resulting impact on a shallow PHC contaminated aquifer. A surficial infiltration pond positioned on the ground surface above a well‐characterized residual PHC source zone was used to control sulfate dosing. A high‐resolution network near the infiltration pond and downgradient of the source zone was employed to monitor relevant geochemical indicators and PHC concentrations. Compound‐specific isotope analysis (CSIA) was used to identify biodegradation patterns and to investigate the occurrence of microbial sulfate reduction. Selected metabolites and reverse‐transcriptase quantitative polymerase chain reaction analyses of expressed biodegradation genes (as mRNA) were also used to characterize the response of indigenous microorganisms (especially sulfate‐reducing bacteria) to the added sulfate. Three sulfate application episodes (5000 L each) at various Na 2 SO 4 concentrations were allowed to infiltrate under a constant hydraulic head. Although the applied sulfate solution was impacted by density‐driven advection, detailed monitoring data indicated that the sulfate‐enriched water mixed with upgradient groundwater as it migrated downward through the residual PHC zone and formed a co‐mingled downgradient plume with the dissolved PHC compounds. The enrichment of δ 34 S of sulfate in conjunction with a decrease in sulfate concentration showed the occurrence of sulfate reduction due to the applied sulfate. Increased dissolved inorganic carbon (DIC) concentrations associated with a shift toward more depleted values of δ 13 C of DIC was indicative of an input of isotopically depleted DIC from biodegradation of PHCs. Despite fluctuations in benzene, toluene, and o ‐xylene (BTX) concentrations, the CSIA data for BTX showed that these compounds were biodegraded. The biomarker data provided supporting evidence that toluene and o ‐xylene were undergoing anaerobic biodegradation due to sulfate reduction. This study provides insight into factors controlling surface‐based delivery of sulfate to shallow PHC impacted groundwater systems, and the value of isotopic and molecular‐biological procedures to augment conventional monitoring tools.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.003

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.012
GPT teacher head0.254
Teacher spread0.242 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations25
Published2018
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueGroundwater Monitoring & RemediationSame topicMicrobial bioremediation and biosurfactantsFrench-language works237,207