Asymptotically Maximal Throughput in Tandem Systems with Flexible and Dedicated Servers
Bibliographic record
Abstract
For a system of two tandem queues with a finite intermediate buffer, we study the asymptotically maximal throughput as the number of servers in each station grows to infinity. First, we study the system with only dedicated servers, and then we examine the system with both dedicated and flexible servers. We assume that travel times between the two stations are negligible and that each server can only work on one customer at a time. We model the system as a birth–death Markov process, derive a closed form solution for the stationary distribution, and quantify the maximal asymptotic normalized throughput as the number of servers grows to infinity. We show that flexibility is more favorable for small systems, and as the number of servers grows, the benefits of flexibility decrease. Furthermore, we prove that when the number of servers goes to infinity, there is no need of flexibility at all, as the maximum value of the throughput is obtained. However, flexibility still has a secondary beneficial effect — a little flexibility (on the order of the square root of the number of dedicated servers at each station) guarantees that all dedicated servers are busy and results in faster convergence to the maximum throughput.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.003 | 0.016 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".