Probing suprathermal electrons by trace rare gases optical emission spectroscopy in low pressure dipolar microwave plasmas excited at the electron cyclotron resonance
Bibliographic record
Abstract
In microwave plasmas with the presence of a magnetic field, fast electrons could result from collisionless energy absorption under electron cyclotron resonance (ECR) conditions. In this case, electrons are trapped between the two poles of the magnetic field and rotate at the cyclotron frequency ωce. When crossing a zone where the cyclotron frequency equals the microwave frequency (ωce=ω), electrons see a steady electric field in their reference frame and are constantly accelerated by the right handed polarized (RHP) wave. When the plasma density reaches the so-called critical density nc at which ωpe2=ω2±ωωce, where ωpe is the plasma electron frequency, the left handed polarized (LHP) electromagnetic wave can excite electrostatic waves that can produce collisionless electron heating and fast electron generation by Landau damping. In this study, a combination of the Langmuir probe and trace rare gas optical emission spectroscopy (TRG-OES) is used to analyze the electron energy probability function (EEPF) in microwave (2.45 GHz) low-pressure argon plasmas excited at ECR in a dipolar magnetic field. While both TRG-OES and Langmuir probe measurements agree on the effective electron temperature (TeAll) from 1.6 to 50 mTorr, TRG-OES, which is more sensitive to high energy electrons, shows that the EEPF is the sum of two Maxwellian populations: one described by TeAll and a high energy tail characterized by a temperature TeTail. Spatially resolved-TRG-OES measurements show that the high-energy tail (TeTail) in the EEPF is spatially localized near the magnet, while the effective electron temperature (TeAll) stays constant. The ratio between the high energy tail and the effective temperatures is found to increase with the absorbed microwave power and decrease with increasing pressure. The former phenomenon is ascribed to a rise in ECR heating due to a stronger RHP wave electric field and to an enhanced absorption of the LHP waves. On the other hand, the decrease in the ratio is attributed to a smaller magnetic confinement of the electrons (increase in the collision frequency), which lessens ECR heating and to a decrease in the LHP field intensity at the resonant position, which impedes the conversion into electrostatic waves.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".