MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Atezolizumab (A) + cobimetinib (C) in metastatic melanoma (mel): Updated safety and clinical activity.

2017· article· en· W2892330548 on OpenAlexaff
Wilson H. Miller, Tae Min Kim, Carrie B. Lee, Keith T. Flaherty, Sunil Reddy, Rahima Jamal, Laura Q.M. Chow, Isabelle Rooney, Bethany Pitcher, Edward Cha, Jeffrey R. Infante

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Clinical Oncology · 2017
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicCancer Immunotherapy and Biomarkers
Canadian institutionsRoche (Canada)Université de MontréalHôpital Notre-DameMcGill UniversityJewish General Hospital
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineAtezolizumabAdverse effectInternal medicineMelanomaOncologyGastroenterologyCancerSurgeryImmunotherapyPembrolizumabCancer research

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

3057 Background: A, an anti–programmed death-ligand 1 (PD-L1) monoclonal antibody, inhibits PD-L1/programmed death-1 (PD-1) and PD-L1/B7.1 binding and shows promising clinical activity in patients (pts) with cutaneous mel (objective response rate [ORR] 33%; median progression-free survival [mPFS] 5.5 months; Hodi et al SMR 2014). C promotes intratumoral T-cell infiltration, major histocompatibility complex 1 upregulation, and PD-L1 expression via targeted MEK inhibition in preclinical models (Ebert et al Immunity 2016) and tumor biopsy specimens (Bendell et al ASCO 2016). Therefore, clinical benefits may be enhanced by combining A + C vs A. This Phase Ib dose-escalation and -expansion study (NCT01988896) suggested higher ORR/disease control rate (DCR, ORR + stable disease) and longer PFS may be achieved with A + C vs A or C alone in mel. We present updated safety and efficacy data. Methods: Oral C, escalated 20 mg→40 mg→60 mg, was given qd for 21 days followed by 7 days off. Intravenous (IV) A was given at 800 mg q2w. Tumor-specific expansion cohorts were enrolled at maximum tolerated doses (C 60 mg/d 21/7; A 800 mg IV q2w). No prior anti–PD-L1 or –PD-1 therapy was allowed. Results: Data cut-off was Oct 12, 2016; 22 patients were safety-evaluable (two ocular, 20 non-ocular [ten each BRAF-mutant and -wild-type]). Median safety follow-up was 14.4 months (range 2.1–23.2). Adverse events (AEs) were experienced in all pts (diarrhea [20 pts, 90.9%] and rash [15 pts, 68.2%] were most common); related grade (G)3–4 AEs in 54.5% (diarrhea [three pts, 13.6%] and dermatitis acneiform [two pts, 9.1%] were most common; no related G5 AEs); related serious AEs in 13.6%. All were manageable. One pt discontinued A + C due to an AE. RECIST v1.1-confirmed ORR was 45.0% in pts with non-ocular mel (median duration of response was not reached); DCR was 75.0%; mPFS was 12.0 months (95% CI 2.8–not evaluable). ORR was similar for pts with BRAF-mutant and wild-type mel. Conclusions: Updated results confirm previous findings that suggest higher ORR/DCR and longer PFS may be achieved with A + C vs A or C monotherapy for mel. Together with biomarker data from other cohorts, our data suggest that the immune contexture may be altered by C, enhancing A activity. Clinical trial information: NCT01988896.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.006

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.144
GPT teacher head0.503
Teacher spread0.359 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations26
Published2017
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Clinical OncologySame topicCancer Immunotherapy and BiomarkersFrench-language works237,207