Knowledge and the transfer of the supermarket from North America to Britain, 1950-1970
Bibliographic record
Abstract
"It is widely acknowledged that key retail innovations of the mid-twentieth century were self-service stores and more especially the supermarket. These innovations arose in North America and quickly spread to Britain in the aftermath of World War II. Whilst recent commentators have drawn increasing attention to the importance of the supermarket in social, economic and cultural terms, detailed research on how these retail innovations were spread is much more limited. The aim of this paper is to explore the diffusion of the supermarket from North America to Britain by examining two key themes; namely, the mechanisms of knowledge transfer and the management of such knowledge. In terms of the mechanisms of knowledge transfer the paper discusses the nature of knowledge and explores the ways in which both tacit and explicit knowledge was moved. The significance of a number of conduits of knowledge on 'modern retailing' is evaluated including the trade press, government ministries, and shop-fitting and store design firms. This is followed by a detailed discussion of the way in which such knowledge was managed. The role of 'interlocking directorates' is explored within this context. Recent research has increasingly stressed the value of such 'interlocks' as mechanisms of communication and even knowledge management. Such ideas are applied to an analysis of the role played by the Canadian owned Weston Group in the development of the supermarket in early post-war Britain. This is based on a detailed reading of the business records of various British grocery retailers which became closely associated with Weston's activities."
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.005 | 0.012 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.004 | 0.004 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.009 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".