An Update on the Canadian Experience Treating End Stage Ankle Arthritis with Fusion or Replacement Surgery
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Category: Ankle Arthritis Introduction/Purpose: There is much interest in the surgical treatment of end-stage ankle arthritis. Our team has previously reported comparisons between ankle fusion and replacement outcomes for 321 ankles at 5.5 years from a prospective cohort. This research extends the observational period for another six years, ending in 2013. Our primary hypothesis is that patient-reported clinical outcomes for ankle fusion and replacements would be similar at last follow up. Methods: Patients in the Canadian Orthopaedic Foot and Ankle Society (COFAS) Prospective Ankle Reconstructive Database were treated with total ankle replacement (involving Agilty, Star, Mobilty, Hintegra, or Inbone) or fusion (open or arthroscopic). Patient characteristics collected included demographics, comorbidities, smoking status and body mass index. Patient-reported outcomes (PROs) completed by patients were the Ankle Osteoarthritis Scale (AOS) and Short Form-36 (SF-36). Pre-operative and most recent patient data, with at least four years follow-up, were analyzed. Sensitivity analyses excluded ankles that had undergone revision. A linear mixed-effects regression model compared scores between total ankle replacement and fusion groups, adjusting for patient characteristics, baseline data and surgeon. Results: The sample included 844 ankles (556 ankle replacements and 284 arthrodesis). The mean follow up period was 8.0 years (standard deviation 3.1 years), with minimum and maximum of 4 and 14 years, respectively. Patients treated with arthrodesis were younger, more likely to be diabetic and smokers, and somewhat less likely to have inflammatory arthritis. Overall, 19.4% of ankle fusion and 30.8% of ankle replacements underwent all-cause re-operation. The mean AOS total score improved from 58.6 points pre-operatively to 31.4 post-operatively (delta 27.2), and from 57.0 to 26.9 points (delta 30.1) in the ankle replacement group. Differences in the change in AOS and SF-36 scores between the arthrodesis and ankle replacement groups were minimal after adjustment for baseline characteristics and surgeon. Conclusion: Clinical outcomes of total ankle replacement and ankle arthrodesis were comparable in a diverse cohort of patients whose follow up period ranged between 4 and 14 years post-operatively.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.004 | 0.010 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.010 | 0.017 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.003 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.009 | 0.002 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".