MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2892362467 · doi:10.1007/s11104-018-3787-2

The effect of pH on morphological and physiological root traits of Lupinus angustifolius treated with struvite as a recycled phosphorus source

2018· article· en· W2892362467 on OpenAlexfundno aff
Ana A. Robles-Aguilar, Jiayin Pang, Johannes A. Postma, Silvia D. Schrey, Hans Lambers, Nicolai David Jablonowski

Bibliographic record

VenuePlant and Soil · 2018
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldAgricultural and Biological Sciences
TopicPlant nutrient uptake and metabolism
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersDirectorate for Biological SciencesMinistry of Forests, Lands and Natural Resource Operations
KeywordsLupinus angustifoliusStruviteRhizospherePhosphorusChemistryPhosphorus deficiencyAgronomyFertilizerNutrientAnimal sciencePlant physiologyHorticultureBotanyBiologyBacteria

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Phosphorus (P) recovery from specific waste streams is necessary to develop environmentally sustainable and efficient fertilizers, achieving maximum productivity with minimum losses. A promising example of a P-recovery product is struvite (MgNH 4 PO 4 ⋅6H 2 O). Phosphorus availability from struvite is profoundly influenced by soil pH and/or processes in the rhizosphere. Root exudates (e.g., organic anions) and root morphology affect fertilizer bioavailability. The overall objective of our study was to identify root morphological and physiological traits of the narrow-leaf lupine ( Lupinus angustifolius L. subsp. angustifolius , cultivar: blau “Boregine”) involved in the acquisition of P from struvite, compared with KH 2 PO 4 as a soluble P source. The study included different pH conditions, as soil pH is one of the main factors affecting P availability. Narrow-leaf lupine plants were grown in river sand under three pH conditions (4.5, 6.5 and 7.5). Three different P treatment conditions were used: 1) KH 2 PO 4 (KP); 2) MgNH 4 PO 4 ⋅6H 2 O (Struvite), both supplied at 15 μg P g −1 dry sand; and 3) no P addition (Nil-P), as control. Organic acids in the rhizosheath were collected. Root morphological parameters such as specific root length and root diameter were analyzed. There was no significant difference in total plant biomass detected under any pH condition between struvite and KP treatments. In both acidic and alkaline conditions, the P-uptake efficiency (PUE: mg P plant −1 /cm 2 root surface area) with struvite was significantly greater than with KP. At neutral pH, there was no difference in PUE between plants supplied with KP or struvite. Plants growing at neutral pH showed greater root exudation of carboxylates (mainly citrate) when struvite was added compared with KP. At alkaline pH, the exudation per unit root surface area was greater than that at acidic or neutral pH. Plants growing in acidic pH had a higher specific root length (SRL) compared with those grown at alkaline or neutral pH. Similar P-uptake efficiency from struvite and KH 2 PO 4 at neutral pH in conjunction with the higher total biomass compared to the Nil-P treatment (70% higher) suggests very effective mobilization of P from struvite by carboxylate exudation. Application of struvite, while taking into account the different strategies for nutrient mobilization, can increase the use efficiency of this recovered P source.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.004

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.012
GPT teacher head0.198
Teacher spread0.186 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations89
Published2018
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuePlant and SoilSame topicPlant nutrient uptake and metabolismFrench-language works237,207