MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2892370576 · doi:10.5539/ijsp.v7n6p49

The Beta Log-Logistic Weibull Distribution: Model, Properties and Application

2018· article· en· W2892370576 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Boikanyo Makubate, Broderick O. Oluyede, Neo Dingalo, Adeniyi Francis Fagbamigbe

Bibliographic record

VenueInternational Journal of Statistics and Probability · 2018
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMathematics
TopicStatistical Distribution Estimation and Applications
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMathematicsWeibull distributionLog-logistic distributionStatisticsGeneralized beta distributionLogistic distributionOrder statisticRayleigh distributionQuantile functionExponential distributionExponentiated Weibull distributionBeta distributionApplied mathematicsProbability density functionMoment-generating functionLogistic regressionDistribution fitting

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

We propose and develop the properties of a new generalized distribution called the beta log-logistic Weibull (BLLoGW) distribution. This model contain several new distributions such as beta log-logistic Rayleigh, beta log-logistic exponential, exponentiated log-logistic Weibull, exponentiated log-logistic Rayleigh, exponentiated log-logistic exponential,  log-logistic Weibull, log-logistic Rayleigh and log-logistic distributions as special cases. Structural properties of this generalized distribution including series expansion of the probability density function and cumulative distribution function, hazard function, reverse hazard function, quantile function, moments, conditional moments, mean deviations, Bonferroni and Lorenz curves, R\'enyi entropy and distribution of order statistics are presented. The parameters of the distribution are estimated using maximum likelihood estimation technique. A Monte Carlo simulation study is conducted to examine the bias and mean square error of the maximum likelihood estimates. A real dataset is used to illustrate the applicability and usefulness of the new generalized distribution.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: Theoretical or conceptual
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.948
Threshold uncertainty score0.296

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.092
GPT teacher head0.355
Teacher spread0.263 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations3
Published2018
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueInternational Journal of Statistics and ProbabilitySame topicStatistical Distribution Estimation and ApplicationsFrench-language works237,207