MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2892393545

A decolonial critical discourse analysis Manitoba Education

2017· article· en· W2892393545 on OpenAlexaffabout
Jerome Cranston

Bibliographic record

Venue2018 Conference of the Canadian Society for the Study of Education · 2017
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicIndigenous and Place-Based Education
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Manitoba
Fundersnot available
KeywordsDisadvantagedIndigenousCertificationKnowledge baseEducational leadershipSociologyPedagogyPopulationTraditional knowledgePolitical sciencePublic relationsLawEcology
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The role that school leaders play in supporting student achievement is well-recognized. However, the knowledge base that underlies school leadership preparation remains anchored in Western, Eurocentric philosophies and values. This knowledge base has failed to support Indigenous students and other students who come from socio-historically disadvantaged groups. This paper reports on a study that used a critical discourse analysis approach within a decolonial research frame to examine a specific set of guidelines for school leadership certification in a Canadian province with a growing Indigenous population. It provides insights into how the knowledge base of school leadership can be developed to better reflect a dynamic two-way relationship between Indigenous and Eurocentric knowledges and better support the preparation of school leaders.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.006
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.005
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Qualitative · Consensus signal: Qualitative
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.429
Threshold uncertainty score0.864

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0060.005
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0040.005
Science and technology studies0.0130.011
Scholarly communication0.0070.002
Open science0.0010.003
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.052
GPT teacher head0.381
Teacher spread0.328 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designQualitative
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2017
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venue2018 Conference of the Canadian Society for the Study of EducationSame topicIndigenous and Place-Based EducationFrench-language works237,207