MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2892423575 · doi:10.31407/ijees9101

TURKEY'S RENEWABLE ENERGY OUTLOOK AND A GENERAL ASSESSMENT OF RECENT DEVELOPMENTS

2018· article· en· W2892423575 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Fatma Çanka Kılıç, Mehmet Keskin Kilic, Muharrem Eyidoğan, Durmuş Kaya

Bibliographic record

VenueInternational Journal of Ecosystems and Ecology Science (IJEES) · 2018
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnergy
TopicGlobal Energy Security and Policy
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsRenewable energyQuarter (Canadian coin)BusinessNatural resource economicsFeed-in tariffSustainable developmentEnergy subsidiesEnergy supplyEnergy securityEnergy policyEnvironmental economicsEnergy (signal processing)EconomicsEngineeringGeographyPolitical science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Turkey is the world's 17th and Europe's 6th largest economy and the country has made significant advances and breakthroughs in its economy since last two decades. Turkey is a very rich country in terms of geographical location and geological structure due to renewable energy sources. The country has planning to take advantage of these resources to the maximum extent aiming both will contribute to security of energy supply and prepare the ground for the creation of new jobs. The installed power of renewable energy sources, which was 12,305 MW in 2002, has reached the value of 36,702 MW in the third quarter of 2017 with an increase of 198%, approximately. This is an indicator that the renewable energy can be a solution to achieve the country's future goals of energy. This paper presents an overview of Turkey's renewable energy appearance and a general examination of renewable energy status with the latest figures, which determined according to the recent developments. It is also aimed to contribute to all fields, businesses and the industry working on renewable energy, not only to whom seeking the newest developments and latest numbers, but also planning to produce green energy and create green jobs for the country's sustainable development.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.880
Threshold uncertainty score0.937

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.017
GPT teacher head0.307
Teacher spread0.290 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2018
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueInternational Journal of Ecosystems and Ecology Science (IJEES)Same topicGlobal Energy Security and PolicyFrench-language works237,207