Albert Bandura: Observational learning in coaching
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Albert Bandura was born on 4 December 1925 in Mundare, Alberta, Canada. His primary and secondary education took place at the one and only school in Mundare, and as a result of this meagre academic environment he soon discovered that learning is largely a social and self-directed endeavour. Following secondary school, he attended the University of British Columbia in Vancouver, where he initially studied psychology as a ‘filler course’, but later became enamoured with the subject. Bandura received his B.A. in psychology in 1949, excelling in the subject and winning the Bolocan Award in the process. Following his undergraduate degree, he moved to the United States for his graduate studies at the University of Iowa, where, he received his M.A. in 1951 and his Ph.D. in clinical psychology in 1952. Following a postdoctoral internship at the Wichita Guidance Center, he began his teaching career in the Department of Psychology at Stanford University in 1953 (Bandura 2014), where he remains to this day in his current position as the David Starr Jordan Professor Emeritus of Social Science in Psychology. Bandura is one of the most well-known and widely cited scholars in bothpsychology and education (Gordon et al. 1984). He was elected president of the American Psychological Society (APA) in 1974, and in 1998, was honoured with the E. L. Thorndike Award of the APA for his research influence on educational psychology, research that has contributed significantly to knowledge, theory and practice in the field. In 2006, he was honoured by the APA with a Gold Medal Award for Distinguished Lifetime Contribution to Psychological Science. Bandura is widely published and highly recognized for his work in social learningtheory, social cognitive theory and self-efficacy. Although it is difficult to pinpoint a single accomplishment that stands above all others, his 1961 Bobo doll experiment certainly ranks near the top of the list. At that time behaviourist theories oflearning were prominent, resulting in the belief that learning was a result of reinforcement. In the Bobo doll experiment Bandura presented children with social models of violent behaviour or non-violent behaviour towards an inflatable Bobo doll. The children who viewed the violent behaviour were in turn violent towards the doll; the control group was rarely violent towards the doll. This experiment demonstrated that observation and social modelling is a very effective way of learning, and moved psychological thinking away from previously limited conceptions in which learning required overt actions.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it