MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2892463365 · doi:10.1109/ted.2018.2867909

Guest Editorial Special Issue on 2-D Materials for Electronic, Optoelectronic, and Sensor Devices

2018· editorial· en· W2892463365 on OpenAlexaff
Youngki Yoon, Saptarshi Das, David Esseni, David Vittorio, Navakanta Bhat, Iriya Muneta, Gengchiau Liang, Frank Schwierz, Stanislav A. Moshkalev

Bibliographic record

VenueIEEE Transactions on Electron Devices · 2018
Typeeditorial
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicSemiconductor materials and devices
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Waterloo
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMiniaturizationCMOSSiliconElectronicsTransistorMoore's lawEngineering physicsSemiconductorNanotechnologyElectrical engineeringSemiconductor deviceScalingMaterials scienceEngineeringOptoelectronicsComputer science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Silicon CMOS technology has fueled the phenomenal growth in semiconductor electronics over the past several decades. The miniaturization of a transistor, the basic tenet of technology scaling, is at the core of this revolution. Despite several challenges, the innovations in materials, processes, and device architecture have ensured that Moore’s law is still alive and going strong, with 7-nm silicon FinFET technology in volume production. However, over the past couple of decades, there has been a realization that the silicon CMOS technology may reach the end of scaling unless it is augmented and complemented by other semiconductors. For instance, there has been a substantial effort in the research community to integrate other bulk semiconductors such as germanium and III-Vs, into silicon technology.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.003
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.007
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Editorial · Consensus signal: Editorial
Teacher disagreement score0.035
Threshold uncertainty score0.118

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0030.007
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0030.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0020.002
Bibliometrics0.0020.001
Science and technology studies0.0020.001
Scholarly communication0.0060.004
Open science0.0020.001
Research integrity0.0070.010
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0350.025

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.006
GPT teacher head0.244
Teacher spread0.238 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEditorial

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2018
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueIEEE Transactions on Electron DevicesSame topicSemiconductor materials and devicesFrench-language works237,207