MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2892529001 · doi:10.1039/c8cp04014a

Density-functional description of alkalides: introducing the alkalide state

2018· article· en· W2892529001 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.
fundA Canadian funder is recorded on the work.

Bibliographic record

VenuePhysical Chemistry Chemical Physics · 2018
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMaterials Science
TopicThermal and Kinetic Analysis
Canadian institutionsDalhousie University
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaCompute Canada
KeywordsState (computer science)Density functional theoryStatistical physicsMaterials scienceThermodynamicsComputer scienceComputational chemistryPhysicsChemistryAlgorithm

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Alkalides are crystalline salts in which the anion is a negatively charged alkali metal. A systematic investigation of the electronic structure of thirteen alkalides, with known crystal structures, is conducted using density-functional theory. For each alkalide, a high-lying valence state is identified that is localised on the alkali anions and is consistent with the low band gap and strong reducing power characteristic of these materials. This 'alkalide state' is compared to a similar state in the related class of electride materials, where the alkali anions are replaced by crystal voids occupied by localised, interstitial electrons. Finally, a thermodynamic cycle is constructed to examine the energy differences between the alkalides and electrides, revealing that the alkali-metal anion significantly stabilises the crystal.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.019
Threshold uncertainty score0.555

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.016
GPT teacher head0.225
Teacher spread0.209 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it